Iraqi PM Says 'British Troops No Longer Required'

British troops are no longer required to provide security in southern Iraq, the country's Prime Minister has told a British newspaper.

Speaking to The Times, Nouri al-Maliki said there still may be a need for their experience in training Iraqi forces and other technical issues, but not as a "fighting" force.

Speaking to the paper about Britain's presence in southern Iraq, Mr al-Maliki said: "We thank them for the role they have played, but I think that their stay is not necessary for maintaining security and control.

"There might be a need for their experience in training and some technological issues, but as a fighting force, I don't think that is necessary."

He also said he looked forward to a "friendly" relationship with the UK government.

However, Mr al-Maliki criticised the UK's decision to move forces last year from their base at a palace in Basra to an airport on the edge of the city, calling the move "very" premature.

He said: "They stayed away from the confrontation, which gave the gangs and militias the chance to control the city.

"The situation deteriorated so badly that corrupted youths were carrying swords and cutting the throats of women and children. The citizens of Basra called out for our help... and we moved to regain the city."

Prime Minister Gordon Brown has indicated he expects the number of troops in Iraq will be reduced next year.

It is understood the 4,100-strong British troops will be cut as they take on a more diplomatic function.

The British Ambassador, Christopher Prentice, told The Times: "It will be good to move out of the artificial relationship in which military aspects had prominence and into a more natural partnership. We fully intend to develop a broad-based relationship with the whole of Iraq.

"I hope that we will see that happen in the course of the next year."

(JM)