02/08/2006
Failed asylum seekers to be deported to Zimbabwe
Failed Zimbabwean asylum-seekers could face being deported back to the country, after a tribunal ruled that they would not automatically face persecution from the authorities.
The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal had been ordered by the High Court in order to reconsider last year's decision that it was not safe for asylum-seekers to be returned to Zimbabwe.
The judge ruled that some asylum-seekers, such as those connected with opposition parties or those with military or criminal records, could be in serious danger of serious mistreatment under President Robert Mugabe's regime. However he said that they might not necessarily face being tortured and said that each case needed to be considered on its particular facts.
All removals to Zimbabwe were halted last October after a failed asylum-seeker, who was not named, won his appeal against deportation.
However, in April, the Court of Appeal ruled that the decision had to be reconsidered, saying that the AIT had "erred in law" in the original decision.
Commenting on the ruling, Tim Finch, Director of Communications for the Refugee Council, said: "We are disappointed to hear this ruling; we still think it's not safe to remove anybody to Zimbabwe in the present circumstances.
"The ruling, while restoring the legal right to enforce removals, nonetheless makes it clear that a lot of people are at real risk if they are sent back. The government has won a small legal victory, but not the moral argument.
"We are very concerned to hear that the government is signalling plans to carry out removals this month on the justification that there has been a rise in applications. The judgement doesn't give a green light to mass removals at all and we hope the government will tread very cautiously and put safety first. In the end, one person sent back who faces persecution or worse, is one person too many."
Zimbabwe was suspended from the Commonwealth, following President Mugabe's re-election in 2002, due to charges of election tampering and human rights abuses, including widespread intimidation and violence against supporters of opposition parties.
Zimbabwe then withdrew from the Commonwealth on December 7, 2003.
Zimbabweans whose asylum claim has been turned down may now face being sent back after a tribunal ruled that it was not illegal for the government to enforce removals.
(KMcA)
The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal had been ordered by the High Court in order to reconsider last year's decision that it was not safe for asylum-seekers to be returned to Zimbabwe.
The judge ruled that some asylum-seekers, such as those connected with opposition parties or those with military or criminal records, could be in serious danger of serious mistreatment under President Robert Mugabe's regime. However he said that they might not necessarily face being tortured and said that each case needed to be considered on its particular facts.
All removals to Zimbabwe were halted last October after a failed asylum-seeker, who was not named, won his appeal against deportation.
However, in April, the Court of Appeal ruled that the decision had to be reconsidered, saying that the AIT had "erred in law" in the original decision.
Commenting on the ruling, Tim Finch, Director of Communications for the Refugee Council, said: "We are disappointed to hear this ruling; we still think it's not safe to remove anybody to Zimbabwe in the present circumstances.
"The ruling, while restoring the legal right to enforce removals, nonetheless makes it clear that a lot of people are at real risk if they are sent back. The government has won a small legal victory, but not the moral argument.
"We are very concerned to hear that the government is signalling plans to carry out removals this month on the justification that there has been a rise in applications. The judgement doesn't give a green light to mass removals at all and we hope the government will tread very cautiously and put safety first. In the end, one person sent back who faces persecution or worse, is one person too many."
Zimbabwe was suspended from the Commonwealth, following President Mugabe's re-election in 2002, due to charges of election tampering and human rights abuses, including widespread intimidation and violence against supporters of opposition parties.
Zimbabwe then withdrew from the Commonwealth on December 7, 2003.
Zimbabweans whose asylum claim has been turned down may now face being sent back after a tribunal ruled that it was not illegal for the government to enforce removals.
(KMcA)
Related UK National News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.
14 October 2005
Zimbabwean wins asylum appeal
The government’s policy on deportation to Zimbabwe has been thrown into doubt, after a failed asylum seeker from the country won his appeal. The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal ruled that the man, who cannot be named, would be at risk of harm if he was returned to President Robert Mugabe’s regime in the southern African state.
Zimbabwean wins asylum appeal
The government’s policy on deportation to Zimbabwe has been thrown into doubt, after a failed asylum seeker from the country won his appeal. The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal ruled that the man, who cannot be named, would be at risk of harm if he was returned to President Robert Mugabe’s regime in the southern African state.
29 October 2008
MS Sufferer Loses Assisted Suicide Challenge
A multiple sclerosis sufferer, who went to the High Court in an attempt to clarify the law on assisted suicide, has lost her legal bid. Debbie Purdy, 45, from Bradford had planned to travel to an assisted suicide clinic in Switzerland, however she had gone to court to ensure her husband would not be prosecuted on his return to the UK.
MS Sufferer Loses Assisted Suicide Challenge
A multiple sclerosis sufferer, who went to the High Court in an attempt to clarify the law on assisted suicide, has lost her legal bid. Debbie Purdy, 45, from Bradford had planned to travel to an assisted suicide clinic in Switzerland, however she had gone to court to ensure her husband would not be prosecuted on his return to the UK.
24 July 2013
Use Of Numberplate Recognition Software Ruled Unlawful
Hertfordshire Constabulary has been told that they must stop using number plate recognition technology, as it is in breach of the law. Watchdog, the Information Commissioner's Officer (ICO), found that the force had not carried our required privacy impact checks.
Use Of Numberplate Recognition Software Ruled Unlawful
Hertfordshire Constabulary has been told that they must stop using number plate recognition technology, as it is in breach of the law. Watchdog, the Information Commissioner's Officer (ICO), found that the force had not carried our required privacy impact checks.
06 June 2013
RE Teacher Fired Over Child Abuse Images Ruled Fit To Teach Again
A professional conduct panel has ruled a teacher sacked for possession of child pornography should be allowed to return to work. 36-year-old Geoffrey Bettley, who taught religious education at St Mary's Catholic School in Menston, West Yorkshire, was suspended in 2010 when almost 200 child abuse images were found on his computer.
RE Teacher Fired Over Child Abuse Images Ruled Fit To Teach Again
A professional conduct panel has ruled a teacher sacked for possession of child pornography should be allowed to return to work. 36-year-old Geoffrey Bettley, who taught religious education at St Mary's Catholic School in Menston, West Yorkshire, was suspended in 2010 when almost 200 child abuse images were found on his computer.
20 September 2012
BSkyB Ruled 'Fit And Proper' By Media Regulator
BSkyB has been ruled as a "fit and proper" company to hold a broadcasting licence, by the UK media regulator. Ofcom investigated the broadcaster in the wake of the phone hacking scandal that engulfed Rupert Murdoch's media empire, which owns 39% of BSkyB.
BSkyB Ruled 'Fit And Proper' By Media Regulator
BSkyB has been ruled as a "fit and proper" company to hold a broadcasting licence, by the UK media regulator. Ofcom investigated the broadcaster in the wake of the phone hacking scandal that engulfed Rupert Murdoch's media empire, which owns 39% of BSkyB.