30/05/2006
Anti-war protester appears in court
Anti-war protester Brian Haw appeared in court on Tuesday, charged with breaching the conditions of his five-year protest outside Parliament.
Mr Haw, 57, appeared at Bow Street Magistrates' Court on Tuesday.
Mr Haw, who gave his address as Parliament Square, although he is originally from Redditch, Worcestershire, told the judge that he could not enter a plea as police had "stolen" placards that he planned to use as evidence.
A plea of not guilty was entered by the judge on his behalf and the case was adjourned until July 11.
Last week, police removed placards belong to Mr Haw during an early morning raid. The £27,000 operation, which was mounted during the early hours of last Tuesday morning, left Mr Haw with just one placard left.
The action was taken over allegations that Mr Haw had breached the conditions relating to demonstrations under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act.
The legislation, which came into effect last July, bans unauthorised protests in and around Parliament Square and restricts permitted protests to cover no more than three metres.
Mr Haw had previously won a ruling that the legislation did not apply to him, because his demonstration began in 2001, before the Act became law.
However, the ruling was overturned by the Court of Appeal.
Speaking outside court on Tuesday, Mr Haw said: "Thery should either evict me from Parliament Square or put me in prison, one way or the other."
(KMcA/SP)
Mr Haw, 57, appeared at Bow Street Magistrates' Court on Tuesday.
Mr Haw, who gave his address as Parliament Square, although he is originally from Redditch, Worcestershire, told the judge that he could not enter a plea as police had "stolen" placards that he planned to use as evidence.
A plea of not guilty was entered by the judge on his behalf and the case was adjourned until July 11.
Last week, police removed placards belong to Mr Haw during an early morning raid. The £27,000 operation, which was mounted during the early hours of last Tuesday morning, left Mr Haw with just one placard left.
The action was taken over allegations that Mr Haw had breached the conditions relating to demonstrations under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act.
The legislation, which came into effect last July, bans unauthorised protests in and around Parliament Square and restricts permitted protests to cover no more than three metres.
Mr Haw had previously won a ruling that the legislation did not apply to him, because his demonstration began in 2001, before the Act became law.
However, the ruling was overturned by the Court of Appeal.
Speaking outside court on Tuesday, Mr Haw said: "Thery should either evict me from Parliament Square or put me in prison, one way or the other."
(KMcA/SP)
Related UK National News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.
23 May 2006
Anti-war protest placards removed from Parliament
Police have removed anti-war placards, which were part of a five-year vigil by peace activist Brian Haw, from outside the Houses of Parliament. Police removed the placards belonging to Mr Haw in the early hours of Tuesday morning, leaving him with just one placard.
Anti-war protest placards removed from Parliament
Police have removed anti-war placards, which were part of a five-year vigil by peace activist Brian Haw, from outside the Houses of Parliament. Police removed the placards belonging to Mr Haw in the early hours of Tuesday morning, leaving him with just one placard.
16 February 2005
Pro-hunt supporters lose hunting ban appeal
The latest appeal by pro-hunt campaigners, Countryside Alliance, to overturn the hunting ban, has been rejected by the Appeal Court. The group had argued that the government's Hunting Act, which becomes law on February 18, is invalid, because the 1949 Parliament Act was used to introduce the act, following opposition in the House of Lords.
Pro-hunt supporters lose hunting ban appeal
The latest appeal by pro-hunt campaigners, Countryside Alliance, to overturn the hunting ban, has been rejected by the Appeal Court. The group had argued that the government's Hunting Act, which becomes law on February 18, is invalid, because the 1949 Parliament Act was used to introduce the act, following opposition in the House of Lords.
25 January 2005
Pro-hunt group mount court challenge to ban
The Countryside Alliance will continue their fight against the government's anti-hunting ban in the High Court today. The pro-hunt group will challenge the legal validity of the Parliament Act 1949, which was used by the House of Commons to force through the anti-hunting bill, over-ruling the House of Lords, which has objected to the bill.
Pro-hunt group mount court challenge to ban
The Countryside Alliance will continue their fight against the government's anti-hunting ban in the High Court today. The pro-hunt group will challenge the legal validity of the Parliament Act 1949, which was used by the House of Commons to force through the anti-hunting bill, over-ruling the House of Lords, which has objected to the bill.
23 October 2009
Crackdown On Fine Dodgers
Six hundred of the Scotland's 'worst fine dodgers' are being targeted in a crackdown by the Scottish Court Service on those who attempt to 'avoid the ends of justice'.
Crackdown On Fine Dodgers
Six hundred of the Scotland's 'worst fine dodgers' are being targeted in a crackdown by the Scottish Court Service on those who attempt to 'avoid the ends of justice'.
02 March 2005
MPs recommend changes for child access system
A report by the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee has called for more child access cases to be dealt with through mediation, not through the court system.
MPs recommend changes for child access system
A report by the Constitutional Affairs Select Committee has called for more child access cases to be dealt with through mediation, not through the court system.