10/05/2006

Consultants contracts 'do not benefit benefit patients'

New NHS contracts for senior hospital doctors in England have provided little benefit to patients, a new report has claimed.

According to the King's Fund report, the new consultant contract, which was implemented in 2003, cost £90 million more to implement than was originally planned. However, the report said that there was "little evidence" to show that it was benefiting patients.

Consultants' pay and pensions have risen substantially since the contracts were introduced. However, the report said that there was "little evidence" that there had been any changes to consultants' working practices.

The report also said that the increased costs had placed "considerable pressure" on hospital budgets and had contributed to the size of deficits faced by some trusts.

Report author Professor James Buchan said: "The consultant contract was supposed to benefit not only consultants but patients and the health service in general. But even though the new contract is still relatively in its infancy, there are significant concerns that some NHS organisations do not seem to have complete plans in place to ensure that the contract can be used to benefit patients directly.

"There needs to be more emphasis at both national and local levels on how the contract can be used as a tool to benefit patients. That may be by looking more closely at consultants' working patterns and ways for managers to help consultants to work more productively."

The British Medical Association said that the reason why the new contracts had cost more than originally planned was because the government had "underestimated" how hard consultants worked for the NHS.

However, a Department of Health spokesperson said that the NHS pay reforms were helping to motivate staff and said that there was still some way to go before the full benefits were realised.

Shadow Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said: "For the vast amount of extra money going into the NHS, we are not nearly getting the increase in productivity required. The government has spent without reform and without providing incentives to increase productivity.

"The government are responsible for this mismanagement of NHS finances and must be held to account."

(KMcA)

Related UK National News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.

26 March 2007
'Postcode lottery' remains in NHS dental care
There are "huge regional variations" in NHS dental care in England, consumer organisation Which? has warned in new research. The survey of 466 dentistry practices - which comes a year after the start of new NHS dentists' contract in England - found that just over a third (36%) are taking on any new NHS patients.
30 October 2006
Campaign to crack down on benefit cheats launched
The government has launched a campaign which aims to crack down on benefit cheats. The 'No Ifs, No Buts' campaign stresses the message that there are no excuses for committing benefit fraud. It is estimated that almost £1 billion was lost last year through benefit fraud, compared to £2 billion in 2001.
14 January 2008
Bank Charges Test Case Set To Open
A High Court test case, which could bring major charges to banks' unauthorised overdraft charges is due to begin today. The case has been brought by the Office of Fair Trading against seven banks, including Barclays, Clydesdale Bank, HBOS and HSBC, and the Nationwide Building Society.
04 January 2005
Five further health trusts make foundation grade
Following approval by the independent regulatory body, five Trusts have been granted Foundation Trust status.
15 January 2014
70% Of NHS Contracts Going To Private Firms
Private firms won almost 70% of all NHS contracts in England between April and December 2013, according to campaign group the NHS Support Federation. The group is opposed to a competitive market in the NHS and claim that of the 57 contracts awarded, 39 went to private firms.