20/02/2006
CBI warns employer compulsion is wrong answer
The CBI today has unveiled proposals to help tackle the UK's emerging pensions crisis without compelling business to contribute to staff pension schemes.
The employers' organisation argued, in its submission to the Government, that enrolment without compulsion is the best way of increasing pensions saving without undermining existing provision.
The CBI recommends a Pension Builder style plan to boost employee pension contributions, combined with additional support for smaller businesses under which government matches employer contributions or offers Pension Tax Credit.
The CBI argues that forcing companies into compulsory pensions contributions would put smaller hard-pressed firms under huge economic pressure and significantly raise labour costs while failing to boost savings levels overall.
John Cridland, Deputy Director-General of the CBI, said: "The CBI wants as many individuals and companies as possible in pension schemes and automatic enrolment is the best way to achieve this; it will overcome the existing inertia about pension provision among employers and employees alike.
"But forcing employers to contribute is neither fair, nor equitable or sensible. As the Pensions Commission says, it is not right to tell a 21-year-old striving to pay off his student debts, or saving for a deposit for a flat, that he must first save for his pension."
Mr Cridland questioned why small companies should be forced to pay into a pension scheme if this could force them out of business or prevent the creation of new jobs.
"The CBI believes there must be an equal right to opt out for both business and employee so individual economic realities can be taken into account. Our proposals are therefore designed to cajole employers, not compel them, into voluntarily contributing to an employee pension saving scheme," he said.
The CBI has proposed a Pension Builder scheme which would see employees divert a percentage of their annual pay rise from their gross salary into their pension scheme but still enjoy increased take-home pay.
Under the CBI's proposal, employers choosing to opt in to a Pension Builder would still contribute 3% of an employee's earnings and the individual would pay 5% - some of which would be salary contribution and tax relief, supplemented by a one-off transfer of part of an annual pay rise into their pension.
(SP)
The employers' organisation argued, in its submission to the Government, that enrolment without compulsion is the best way of increasing pensions saving without undermining existing provision.
The CBI recommends a Pension Builder style plan to boost employee pension contributions, combined with additional support for smaller businesses under which government matches employer contributions or offers Pension Tax Credit.
The CBI argues that forcing companies into compulsory pensions contributions would put smaller hard-pressed firms under huge economic pressure and significantly raise labour costs while failing to boost savings levels overall.
John Cridland, Deputy Director-General of the CBI, said: "The CBI wants as many individuals and companies as possible in pension schemes and automatic enrolment is the best way to achieve this; it will overcome the existing inertia about pension provision among employers and employees alike.
"But forcing employers to contribute is neither fair, nor equitable or sensible. As the Pensions Commission says, it is not right to tell a 21-year-old striving to pay off his student debts, or saving for a deposit for a flat, that he must first save for his pension."
Mr Cridland questioned why small companies should be forced to pay into a pension scheme if this could force them out of business or prevent the creation of new jobs.
"The CBI believes there must be an equal right to opt out for both business and employee so individual economic realities can be taken into account. Our proposals are therefore designed to cajole employers, not compel them, into voluntarily contributing to an employee pension saving scheme," he said.
The CBI has proposed a Pension Builder scheme which would see employees divert a percentage of their annual pay rise from their gross salary into their pension scheme but still enjoy increased take-home pay.
Under the CBI's proposal, employers choosing to opt in to a Pension Builder would still contribute 3% of an employee's earnings and the individual would pay 5% - some of which would be salary contribution and tax relief, supplemented by a one-off transfer of part of an annual pay rise into their pension.
(SP)
Related UK National News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.
08 April 2004
Tax relief surprise for some employee shareholders
The Finance Bill was a "pleasant surprise" for employee shareholders, accountancy firm PricewaterhouseCoopers has said. Under new rules many employees will be able to claim double tax relief for contributing shares acquired through a save as you earn (SAYE) option plan or share incentive plan (SIP) into a registered pension scheme.
Tax relief surprise for some employee shareholders
The Finance Bill was a "pleasant surprise" for employee shareholders, accountancy firm PricewaterhouseCoopers has said. Under new rules many employees will be able to claim double tax relief for contributing shares acquired through a save as you earn (SAYE) option plan or share incentive plan (SIP) into a registered pension scheme.
14 September 2007
Workers Warned On 'Forgotten Pensions'
Over half of UK adults have no idea how much money they've built up in pension schemes, while one in six people have no details of where their money is saved, government research has revealed. Findings published by government website Directgov show that a substantial number of people are failing to keep track of pensions savings.
Workers Warned On 'Forgotten Pensions'
Over half of UK adults have no idea how much money they've built up in pension schemes, while one in six people have no details of where their money is saved, government research has revealed. Findings published by government website Directgov show that a substantial number of people are failing to keep track of pensions savings.
20 June 2005
Pensions coalition calls for ‘fair deal’
A new coalition is calling on the new government to deliver a new ‘fair deal’ on pensions. Four organisations – the Trades Union Congress (TUC), Age Concern, Help the Aged and consumer watchdog Which? – have joined together to form the People’s Pensions Coalition to campaign for fair pensions reform.
Pensions coalition calls for ‘fair deal’
A new coalition is calling on the new government to deliver a new ‘fair deal’ on pensions. Four organisations – the Trades Union Congress (TUC), Age Concern, Help the Aged and consumer watchdog Which? – have joined together to form the People’s Pensions Coalition to campaign for fair pensions reform.
15 April 2005
Conservatives pledge to 'simplify' pension rules
The Conservatives have unveiled proposals to “reduce and simplify complex pensions rules” and promised to encourage more firms to provide pension schemes for workers.
Conservatives pledge to 'simplify' pension rules
The Conservatives have unveiled proposals to “reduce and simplify complex pensions rules” and promised to encourage more firms to provide pension schemes for workers.
07 April 2005
Pension Protection Fund launches
A scheme to protect employees' pension schemes in the event of their employer declaring bankruptcy has been launched.
Pension Protection Fund launches
A scheme to protect employees' pension schemes in the event of their employer declaring bankruptcy has been launched.