21/10/2005

Poor pupil behaviour targeted in new proposals

The government has supported a range of new proposals aimed at strengthening teachers’ rights to tackle badly behaved pupils.

A report by the government’s school discipline and behaviour task force recommended giving teachers the right to discipline and physically restrain badly behaved children.

The report’s recommendations also included extending the use of parenting contracts; making parents responsible for the supervision of excluded pupils by fining them if their child is found out on the streets during school hours; the development of a National Behaviour Charter; and the monitoring of pupils’ behaviour via the education watchdog Ofsted.

Sir Alan Steer, leader of the taskforce, said that schools needed to take “firm and consistent action” to deal with bad behaviour and stressed that parental cooperation was also essential.

Sir Alan said: "Contrary to what is often said, most schools are orderly places that for some children provide the stability and security they don't have in the rest of their lives. But we also know that a small minority of unruly pupils can make life very difficult for teachers and do real damage to the learning and attainment of other pupils in a class.

"The changes that we have recommended strengthen the authority of schools, giving them the confidence to take action and send a clear message to parents and pupils that they also have a responsibility in dealing with the problem."

Education Secretary Ruth Kelly accepted the recommendations and the government would implement them “as soon as possible”. She said: "The Government has made tackling poor behaviour a major priority, providing increased powers and resources.

"Ofsted also tell us that behaviour is good in most schools most of the time. But some schools still face real discipline challenges because there is too little consistency in dealing with poor behaviour. There is still too much low-level disruption to lessons - backchat, rudeness, calling out in class - that makes teaching and learning more difficult.

"These proposals can help bring change not just to the rules but to the culture reaffirming respect in classrooms and putting teachers firmly in charge.

Commenting on the report, Mick Brookes, NAHT General Secretary, said: “The Government must ensure that the demands on schools are reduced in order to maintain the positive practice described in this report. It is obvious that school leaders under pressure to implement an unending plethora of initiatives are finding it much harder to react in a timely and effective manner to challenging behaviour.”

(KMcA/SP)

Related UK National News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.

06 November 2003
Secondary pupils to gain from London pledge
London secondary pupils are to get free and subsidised entry to a range of cultural, artistic and sporting attractions in the capital as part of government plans announced today.
05 December 2013
£1bn Towards Free School Meals
£1bn is being unlocked to fund the Department of Education's free school meals commitment. The news, announced by deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, follows an announcement in September that every child in reception, year 1 and year 2 in state-funded schools will receive a free school lunch.
02 October 2008
Free School Meals For Scots Primary School Pupils
All school pupils in primaries one to three in Scotland are to be entitled to free school meals following successful pilot schemes.
06 June 2005
Boys’ diets ‘less healthy’ than girls
Boys are less likely than girls to eat Jamie Oliver-style healthy school dinners, according to new research by a UK cancer charity. A survey of around 1,300 children by Cancer Research UK found that fatty and sugary foods, as well as meat, processed meat and eggs, were more popular with boys, while girls tended to like more fruit and vegetables.
09 November 2005
Public schools found guilty of fee fixing
Fifty of England’s top public schools have broken competition law by exchanging information about fees, the Office of Fair Trading has announced. Following an investigation lasting more than two years, the OFT found that pupils’ parents ended up paying higher fees as a result of the information-sharing.