06/05/2004
Supermodel wins privacy case against Daily Mirror
Supermodel Naomi Campbell has successfully won a landmark privacy case taken against the Daily Mirror.
In a split three-to-two decision the Law Lords ruled in Miss Campbell's favour, overturning an Appeal Court ruling that the Daily Mirror had been entitled to publish information on her private life, including pictures of her leaving a Narcotics Anonymous meeting in February 2001.
The case had been already been overturned on appeal, following a High Court ruling in her favour. The Appeal Court had ordered her to pay the newspaper's legal costs; then amounting to £350,000.
Though the ruling is considered to do little to clarify privacy law in the UK, legal experts have warned that the Law Lords' ruling has serious implications for the media, which often seeks to report revelations about the private lives of high profile celebrities.
Miss Campbell's lawyer, Keith Schilling described the ruling as "not only a vindication for her personally" but one that represented "a real advantage for the rights of people to maintain important elements of their privacy, particularly when related to therapy and people who need to have treatment".
The Law Lords finding reinstates the High Court award of £3,500 made to Miss Campbell on the grounds of breaches of confidentiality and duty under the 1998 Data Protection Act.
The Lords also issued an injunction on the newspaper to prevent any further publication of pictures of Miss Campbell leaving Narcotics Anonymous meetings.
Mirror Group Newspapers is now faced with legal costs estimated to be in excess of £1.5 million.
(SP)
In a split three-to-two decision the Law Lords ruled in Miss Campbell's favour, overturning an Appeal Court ruling that the Daily Mirror had been entitled to publish information on her private life, including pictures of her leaving a Narcotics Anonymous meeting in February 2001.
The case had been already been overturned on appeal, following a High Court ruling in her favour. The Appeal Court had ordered her to pay the newspaper's legal costs; then amounting to £350,000.
Though the ruling is considered to do little to clarify privacy law in the UK, legal experts have warned that the Law Lords' ruling has serious implications for the media, which often seeks to report revelations about the private lives of high profile celebrities.
Miss Campbell's lawyer, Keith Schilling described the ruling as "not only a vindication for her personally" but one that represented "a real advantage for the rights of people to maintain important elements of their privacy, particularly when related to therapy and people who need to have treatment".
The Law Lords finding reinstates the High Court award of £3,500 made to Miss Campbell on the grounds of breaches of confidentiality and duty under the 1998 Data Protection Act.
The Lords also issued an injunction on the newspaper to prevent any further publication of pictures of Miss Campbell leaving Narcotics Anonymous meetings.
Mirror Group Newspapers is now faced with legal costs estimated to be in excess of £1.5 million.
(SP)
Related UK National News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.
26 January 2005
Harman to deliver speech on domestic violence privacy law
Solicitor General Harriet Harman will discuss a new law protecting the identities of domestic violence victims at a conference tomorrow. Ms Harman, who is the keynote speaker at the Domestic Abuse Regional Conference, in Newmarket, will discuss the new law, which grants courts the power to prevent the press and media from identifying a witness.
Harman to deliver speech on domestic violence privacy law
Solicitor General Harriet Harman will discuss a new law protecting the identities of domestic violence victims at a conference tomorrow. Ms Harman, who is the keynote speaker at the Domestic Abuse Regional Conference, in Newmarket, will discuss the new law, which grants courts the power to prevent the press and media from identifying a witness.
21 June 2012
Census Faces Right To Privacy Challenge In High Court
Two men who say that the 2011 census was unlawful because of a provision in the act that governs it which allows data to be passed to third parties, will bring their case in front of a high court judge on Thursday.
Census Faces Right To Privacy Challenge In High Court
Two men who say that the 2011 census was unlawful because of a provision in the act that governs it which allows data to be passed to third parties, will bring their case in front of a high court judge on Thursday.
24 May 2011
Injunctions Questioned As MP Names Footballer
The future of injunctions is hanging in the balance after a Lib Dem MP named the footballer in Parliament involved in an injunction to hide an alleged affair. During a Commons question on privacy orders, John Hemming named Manchester United footballer Ryan Giggs as the man at the centre of the gagging order.
Injunctions Questioned As MP Names Footballer
The future of injunctions is hanging in the balance after a Lib Dem MP named the footballer in Parliament involved in an injunction to hide an alleged affair. During a Commons question on privacy orders, John Hemming named Manchester United footballer Ryan Giggs as the man at the centre of the gagging order.
15 May 2008
Stars Win Privacy Damages For Holiday Snaps
Three high profile stars have won legal damages for the publication of photos without their knowledge.
Stars Win Privacy Damages For Holiday Snaps
Three high profile stars have won legal damages for the publication of photos without their knowledge.
07 May 2008
Rowling Wins Court Of Appeal Case
In a decision that may have lasting implications over the photographing of celebrities, JK Rowling has won a Court of Appeal case.
Rowling Wins Court Of Appeal Case
In a decision that may have lasting implications over the photographing of celebrities, JK Rowling has won a Court of Appeal case.