27/01/2004
Law Lords' ruling could open up juries to public scrutiny
A landmark ruling in the House of Lords could pave the way for the secret world of juries to be opened up for public debate, the government has announced.
Following a ruling by the Law Lords, the "exceptional circumstances" in which a court can investigate the nature of jury deliberations is now open to question.
The 4-1 majority Law Lords' ruling has prompted Courts Minister Chris Leslie to announce that a consultation paper will be prepared to consider whether the government should allow research to be conducted on jury deliberations and juror impropriety.
However, the judges' ruling confirmed that jury deliberations must remain secret and that this is consistent with the "right to fair trial" in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Mr Leslie said: "The finding is good news for two significant reasons. Firstly, it confirms that the defendants had a fair trial as enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights.
"It is extremely important that the community, and those who work in the Criminal Justice System, have confidence in the decisions made by jurors.
"Secondly, it opens the door for the government to consult more broadly than it otherwise could have, on aspects of jury work.
"This is desirable in order to ensure that the system is working properly and that jurors feel they have everything they need to do their job properly."
While problems do exist within the jury system, such as the time some jurors have to wait before their case begins, individual jurors are nevertheless generally impressed with the way Judges perform in Court, the Department for Constitutional Affairs said.
Unlike some areas of the Criminal Justice System, public confidence in jury work is "high" and the specific issue of jury satisfaction with Judges has been confirmed in a government-commissioned report – 'Jurors' Perceptions, Understanding, Confidence and Satisfaction in the Jury System: A Study in Six Courts'.
In the report, judges were praised for their perceived "professionalism, consideration shown, particularly to jurors, their ability to summarise and clarify information and their impartiality".
Commenting on the report, Lord Justice Judge, the Deputy Chief Justice, said: "Jurors are generally extremely impressed with the way in which judges in the Crown Court perform their duties.
"The results of this research should contribute to increased public confidence in the judicial system. They represent informed views among those directly involved, who have had a significant personal opportunity to observe the system in action."
Every year about 480,000 people are summoned to serve on a jury.
(gmcg)
Following a ruling by the Law Lords, the "exceptional circumstances" in which a court can investigate the nature of jury deliberations is now open to question.
The 4-1 majority Law Lords' ruling has prompted Courts Minister Chris Leslie to announce that a consultation paper will be prepared to consider whether the government should allow research to be conducted on jury deliberations and juror impropriety.
However, the judges' ruling confirmed that jury deliberations must remain secret and that this is consistent with the "right to fair trial" in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Mr Leslie said: "The finding is good news for two significant reasons. Firstly, it confirms that the defendants had a fair trial as enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights.
"It is extremely important that the community, and those who work in the Criminal Justice System, have confidence in the decisions made by jurors.
"Secondly, it opens the door for the government to consult more broadly than it otherwise could have, on aspects of jury work.
"This is desirable in order to ensure that the system is working properly and that jurors feel they have everything they need to do their job properly."
While problems do exist within the jury system, such as the time some jurors have to wait before their case begins, individual jurors are nevertheless generally impressed with the way Judges perform in Court, the Department for Constitutional Affairs said.
Unlike some areas of the Criminal Justice System, public confidence in jury work is "high" and the specific issue of jury satisfaction with Judges has been confirmed in a government-commissioned report – 'Jurors' Perceptions, Understanding, Confidence and Satisfaction in the Jury System: A Study in Six Courts'.
In the report, judges were praised for their perceived "professionalism, consideration shown, particularly to jurors, their ability to summarise and clarify information and their impartiality".
Commenting on the report, Lord Justice Judge, the Deputy Chief Justice, said: "Jurors are generally extremely impressed with the way in which judges in the Crown Court perform their duties.
"The results of this research should contribute to increased public confidence in the judicial system. They represent informed views among those directly involved, who have had a significant personal opportunity to observe the system in action."
Every year about 480,000 people are summoned to serve on a jury.
(gmcg)
Related UK National News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.
17 February 2010
Juries 'Confused' In Court
More than two-thirds of jurors sitting in England and Wales have difficulty understanding legal terminology used in court, a report revealed today. Research from the Justice Department found that only 31% of those questioned could comprehend the legal explanations and directions given by judges.
Juries 'Confused' In Court
More than two-thirds of jurors sitting in England and Wales have difficulty understanding legal terminology used in court, a report revealed today. Research from the Justice Department found that only 31% of those questioned could comprehend the legal explanations and directions given by judges.
06 September 2011
Clarke Backs Televised Court Proceedings
The Secretary of State has aired his support for televised court proceedings, saying there was "no good reason" why not. Speaking on Monday, Ken Clarke said televising judges' comments would be a good idea, which would help to demystify the process and give the public confidence in the justice system.
Clarke Backs Televised Court Proceedings
The Secretary of State has aired his support for televised court proceedings, saying there was "no good reason" why not. Speaking on Monday, Ken Clarke said televising judges' comments would be a good idea, which would help to demystify the process and give the public confidence in the justice system.
09 March 2010
Bilingual Juries 'Cannot Outweigh' Justice
Selecting juries randomly from the community outweighs the benefits of selecting exclusively bilingual juries for some trials in Wales, the Government has said. The decision announced today, follows a consultation on whether to select juries for certain criminal trials in Wales, all of whose members would be bilingual in Welsh and English.
Bilingual Juries 'Cannot Outweigh' Justice
Selecting juries randomly from the community outweighs the benefits of selecting exclusively bilingual juries for some trials in Wales, the Government has said. The decision announced today, follows a consultation on whether to select juries for certain criminal trials in Wales, all of whose members would be bilingual in Welsh and English.
26 February 2014
Lee Rigby Murderers To Be Sentenced
Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale are in court to be sentenced for the murder of soldier Lee Rigby. Fusilier Rigby was murdered in Woolwich in May last year as he made he was back to his barracks.
Lee Rigby Murderers To Be Sentenced
Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale are in court to be sentenced for the murder of soldier Lee Rigby. Fusilier Rigby was murdered in Woolwich in May last year as he made he was back to his barracks.
24 January 2014
Court Of Appeal To Consider Legality Of Whole-Life Sentence
Five leading Court of Appeal judges are to hear challenges today over whole-life terms. The judges are to consider if the sentence of jail without the possibility of parole remains legally possible. It follows a ruling last year by the European Court of Human Rights, saying that the jail term needed to be reviewed "at some point".
Court Of Appeal To Consider Legality Of Whole-Life Sentence
Five leading Court of Appeal judges are to hear challenges today over whole-life terms. The judges are to consider if the sentence of jail without the possibility of parole remains legally possible. It follows a ruling last year by the European Court of Human Rights, saying that the jail term needed to be reviewed "at some point".