03/07/2012
Stop Exam Boards Fighting To Offer The Easiest Exam, Says Education Committee
After a long inquiry the UK Parliaments Education Committee has concluded that competition between exam boards creates significant pressure to drive down standards in exams and that the time is right for fundamental reform.
In a wide ranging report which covers many aspects of the examinations system and which took evidence for nearly a year, the Committee rejects moves to a single national exam board or to single boards for each subject.
In a hard-hitting report the cross-party committee says that exam boards should be stripped of the right to own their own syllabus and content. The Committee suggests that there should be a single national syllabus for each subject which would be accredited by the regulator, Ofqual, with every exam board able to set question papers against that syllabus.
The Chair of the Committee, Graham Stuart MP, said: "The public have lost confidence in exam standards and this needs to be put right. We’ve got to stop the dumbing down of the courses young people sit and stop exam boards competing on how 'accessible' their syllabuses are.
"You could move to a single national exam board which would stop the 'race to the bottom' but the change would be disruptive and threaten innovation and cost control. Alternatively there are benefits to having one exam board per subject but such "franchising" would create its own difficulties over pricing, tendering and the concentration of expertise.
"We believe the best reform would be the creation of National Syllabuses. There could be a competition, such as the Secretary of State has already suggested, to decide which exam board would design the syllabus for a particular subject which would then be accredited by the regulator, Ofqual. After that any board could set an exam for that syllabus and compete on innovation, efficiency, service and support. Ofqual would ensure that exam boards didn't compete by making papers easier and could readily identify problems and make statistical adjustments if necessary.
"Importantly the content of what children learn would be enriched, rigour would be encouraged and both standards and public confidence in them could be restored. Across all the parties on the Committee and with unanimous support we recommend the Government looks to introduce National Syllabuses so as to retain the dynamism and diversity of England’s examination system while ending grade inflation and creating truly world class qualifications."
The Committee also recommends that Ofqual should set up national subject committees, with representatives from universities, employers and learned bodies, to help monitor standards in major GCSE and A level subjects.
The Education Committee calls for an urgent review of the school accountability system which drives behaviour in schools and calls for a more balanced scorecard which gives equal weight to the progress and attainment of every pupil.
(GK)
In a wide ranging report which covers many aspects of the examinations system and which took evidence for nearly a year, the Committee rejects moves to a single national exam board or to single boards for each subject.
In a hard-hitting report the cross-party committee says that exam boards should be stripped of the right to own their own syllabus and content. The Committee suggests that there should be a single national syllabus for each subject which would be accredited by the regulator, Ofqual, with every exam board able to set question papers against that syllabus.
The Chair of the Committee, Graham Stuart MP, said: "The public have lost confidence in exam standards and this needs to be put right. We’ve got to stop the dumbing down of the courses young people sit and stop exam boards competing on how 'accessible' their syllabuses are.
"You could move to a single national exam board which would stop the 'race to the bottom' but the change would be disruptive and threaten innovation and cost control. Alternatively there are benefits to having one exam board per subject but such "franchising" would create its own difficulties over pricing, tendering and the concentration of expertise.
"We believe the best reform would be the creation of National Syllabuses. There could be a competition, such as the Secretary of State has already suggested, to decide which exam board would design the syllabus for a particular subject which would then be accredited by the regulator, Ofqual. After that any board could set an exam for that syllabus and compete on innovation, efficiency, service and support. Ofqual would ensure that exam boards didn't compete by making papers easier and could readily identify problems and make statistical adjustments if necessary.
"Importantly the content of what children learn would be enriched, rigour would be encouraged and both standards and public confidence in them could be restored. Across all the parties on the Committee and with unanimous support we recommend the Government looks to introduce National Syllabuses so as to retain the dynamism and diversity of England’s examination system while ending grade inflation and creating truly world class qualifications."
The Committee also recommends that Ofqual should set up national subject committees, with representatives from universities, employers and learned bodies, to help monitor standards in major GCSE and A level subjects.
The Education Committee calls for an urgent review of the school accountability system which drives behaviour in schools and calls for a more balanced scorecard which gives equal weight to the progress and attainment of every pupil.
(GK)
Related UK National News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.
09 May 2005
GCSE exam papers to be replaced
Around half a million GCSE exam papers are being replaced after papers were stolen from one delivery van and more were reported as ‘lost’ from another van. The papers from the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA) examination board are for exams in French, science and history.
GCSE exam papers to be replaced
Around half a million GCSE exam papers are being replaced after papers were stolen from one delivery van and more were reported as ‘lost’ from another van. The papers from the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA) examination board are for exams in French, science and history.
26 October 2012
Legal Action Launched Over English GSCE Exam
Legal action has been launched against exam regulator Ofqual and two exam boards by a group of head teachers and councils over last June’s English GCSE exam. Court papers have been served on exam boards AQA and Edexcel, detailing the case for the exams to be regraded.
Legal Action Launched Over English GSCE Exam
Legal action has been launched against exam regulator Ofqual and two exam boards by a group of head teachers and councils over last June’s English GCSE exam. Court papers have been served on exam boards AQA and Edexcel, detailing the case for the exams to be regraded.
11 October 2012
Thousands To Resit English GCSE
Some 45,000 students will resit their English GCSEs next month following a dispute over grades, the BBC has reported. The broadcaster has said figures given to them by exam boards show that the number to resit is about one in 14 of those who took the exam earlier this year.
Thousands To Resit English GCSE
Some 45,000 students will resit their English GCSEs next month following a dispute over grades, the BBC has reported. The broadcaster has said figures given to them by exam boards show that the number to resit is about one in 14 of those who took the exam earlier this year.
21 December 2011
Ofqual Orders Paper Re-Write
The exam regulator Ofqual has ordered the re-writing of an exam paper after it emerged some exam boards were offering pre-exam advice to teachers. The watchdog threatened further action after investigating the reports into exam boards saying it found a "clear breach" of rules at a WJEC exam board seminar about a GCSE ICT paper.
Ofqual Orders Paper Re-Write
The exam regulator Ofqual has ordered the re-writing of an exam paper after it emerged some exam boards were offering pre-exam advice to teachers. The watchdog threatened further action after investigating the reports into exam boards saying it found a "clear breach" of rules at a WJEC exam board seminar about a GCSE ICT paper.
16 June 2010
Ofqual 'Rejects' New Science GCSEs
Exam boards have "not gone far enough" to redraft new science GCSEs after Ofqual said they are still not hard enough. Ofqual has sent the new-look science exams back to the awarding organisations for more work to bring them up to the required standards.
Ofqual 'Rejects' New Science GCSEs
Exam boards have "not gone far enough" to redraft new science GCSEs after Ofqual said they are still not hard enough. Ofqual has sent the new-look science exams back to the awarding organisations for more work to bring them up to the required standards.